The End




I feel like now is the time to stop writing on here. It’s just not the same as it used to be.


The YDM Facebook page was report-jihaded to death earlier today. Combine that with more work and other stuff going on in my life, the choice to stop doing YDM became clear. I’m still going to be writing, just nothing to do with this counterjihad business. Perhaps you’ll stumble upon my next endeavor one of these days.


Don’t forget to vote in the Muslim of the Year poll if you haven’t done so already. That is still going on and will be updated once it concludes.


And wherever you are, don’t stop fighting.


-Hunter





Your Daily Muslim #651: Khizar bin Qasim


Khizar bin Qasim doesn't realize selfies are best taken with smartphones

Khizar bin Qasim doesn’t realize selfies are best taken with smartphones



Pakistani Muslim Khizar bin Qasim clearly failed every science class he ever took. The jihad terror supporter and self-described “haxor” (internet slang for “hacker”) claims that Israelis are the offspring of porcine-canine intercourse. Actually, not just pig-on-dog sex, but gay pig-on-dog sex. Take a look:


khizarbinqasim


Once you’re finished laughing at the ridiculousness of offspring being produced by homosexual interspecies copulation, there’s some more serious anti-Semitism to get into. The fact that this Muslim openly dehumanizes Jews is disturbing enough, but claiming Hitler was right? Wow. That’s overt support of genocidal ideology. Then again, that is what Islam advocates against Jews, so it shouldn’t be that surprising. However, it’s not all that common to find Muslims who are willing to be so candid about their Jew-hatred.


As for the bit about vaginas and defecation – I really don’t know what he’s getting at, and I consider myself fluent in unintelligible Islamic foam.


khizarbinqasim3


Again, more dehumanizing of Jews and lewdness. It’s almost as if the Qur’an teaches them this stuff… but surey that can’t be; Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance!


khizarbinqasim2


Actually, the Islamic State (ISIS) terror group are the ones getting their asses kicked by females (some Muslims believe it is a great shame to die at the hand of a female), which is nothing to be ashamed of unless you’re sexist. Needless to say, I suspect bin Qasim will be enjoying the company of his hand for quite some time.




Your Daily Muslim #650: Bala Garba Jahumpa


Bala Garba Jahumpa

Bala Garba Jahumpa



The Gambia is not known for being friendly to gays thanks to its Islamic faith. Even its president has likened gays to a plethora of viruses and has threatened gays with life behind bars if caught. Today’s daily Muslim, The Gambia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Bala Garba Jahumpa (pronounced Ball o’Garbage Humper), hates gays as much as the nation’s president. Earlier this year, Jahumpa nearly died after a vehicular collision with a bovine. However, his near-death experience didn’t change his views. In a recent speech, he made numerous comments ranging from the spiteful to the truly delusional. In other words, the same old crap we’re used to from Muslims.


The Gambia is not particularly well-to-do, and international aid would be of great benefit to the nation. However, Jahumpa basically shot that possibility down: “We the government and people of The Gambia hereby make it very clear to the Union European and any outside bloc that wants to impose acceptance of homosexuals as a pre-condition for aid that we will never accept that conditionality no matter how much aid is involved.” Oh look, a Muslim actively opposing human rights. Still think that all religions are the same, left-wingers?


“Our country’s socioeconomic development depends only on the almighty Allah’s benevolence,” Jahumpa said, not realizing how idiotic that statement is. The Gambia is ranked as the 31st-poorest country in the world. Jahumpa’s invisible sky-demon is clearly quite benevolent. “We also hereby declare that The Gambia will always be an independent, dignified and Allah worshipping Muslim country where our way of life; our laws will be based on our Islamic values, that is, the strict adherence to our Islamic faith.” There is NOTHING dignified about denying people their rights. There is nothing dignified about forcing a religion on people whose nature it goes against. You know how many Muslims use that “there is no compulsion in religion” line to claim that no one is forced to be Muslim? Yeah, because being forced to live like a Muslim is totally different than being forced to be a Muslim.


“As an independent Muslim country, we will not be tied to any bloc that promotes decadence and ungodly behavior that are not only Satanic, but they are also detrimental to human existence, such as homosexuality; especially when it is used as a pre-condition for receiving aid.” Tell me again how homosexuality is detrimental to human existence? Was da Vinci a bad guy? How about Alan Turing? Us gays have always been and will always be. GET USED TO IT, Muslims.


Jahumpa then went further off the rails. “If the European Union is really interested in the protection of homosexuals in Africa as a human right; why are they slaughtering young and decent African migrants in their thousands on European soil?” Slaughtering young and decent African migrants? If such a thing were happening, it would make the news. It hasn’t made the news because innocent immigrants aren’t being massacred as Jahumpa stated. The few who are killed by police (European police are much more responsible and less violent than the American variety) are actively engaging in violent behavior. Jahumpa’s claim that European countries were violating immigrants’ human rights is devoid of factual basis (like his religion) and is a poor attempt to deflect from his own nation’s abuses.




Your Daily Muslim #649: Linda Hardan




Linda Hardan

Linda Hardan. If I were straight, I still wouldn’t, even with beer goggles.



This post contains adult thematic material that may not be suitable for all audiences. Reader discretion is advised.


Many left-wingers argue that it is impossible for a female to rape a male. This controversial stance has recently come to light after actor Shia LaBoeuf’s disclosure that he was raped by a woman; many argued that rape equals sexual violence plus institutional power, not just the sexual violence component. However, that isn’t the legal (or dictionary) definition of rape, and people who think men can’t be raped are rightly regarded as crazy by the average citizen. Their fringe-left “privilege” fanaticism rivals that of Islamists’ crazed devotion, to the point of severing all ties with loved ones who don’t agree with their outlandish views. Many – none of whom are (or even interact with) men – argue that an erection is equal to consent.


Today’s daily Muslim, Linda Hardan (NOT to be confused with Hard-on), 21, is accused of raping a male. With a headbag not quite tight enough to hide her burgeoning double chin, pimple-ridden Hardan, a substitute teacher, found her prey. He was 16, and the two formed a rapport. When he got into her car after school one day, he didn’t know what he was in for. All seemed well until she drove off course and parked the car. Hardan then allegedly molested the teen. Regardless of whether or not he had or developed an erection (which is unknown), HE DIDN’T WANT IT and NO MEANS NO. I don’t care how desperate you are or if you think that an erection equals consent, go play with your vibrator or get a Tinder. It’s ridiculous that some still fail to grasp this, but rape is NOT OK. EVER.


Hardan is facing up to 16.5 years behind bars on charges of child endangerment, sexual assault, and criminal sexual contact. You’d think that a devout Muslimah would know better than to molest a teenage boy, right? Well, her prophet, pigs be upon him, molested a 9-year-old girl, and thus the religion doesn’t set an age limit for when sexual contact is deemed unacceptable. Needless to say, Islam doesn’t have the best track record as far as child welfare.





Your Daily Muslim #648: Khalil Attieh


Khalil Attieh

Khalil Attieh



“Hating the Jews is a great honor for me and it makes me walk with my head high, because they are worthy of hatred… Any man of honor should hate the Jews.”


Jordanian MP Khalil Attieh really doesn’t like Jews. His hatred likely stems from a deep-seated inferiority complex brought about by alopecia, an expansive waistline, and the resulting lack of sex, but I’m not going to go into that. I’ll let him tell you about his anti-Semitic views:


“By Allah, it is an honor to incite against the Jews,” Attieh said. So much for that whole “coexist” mantra the liberals spout. “Our people in Palestine expect us to support them, and to recite Qur’an verses for the souls of their martyrs.” Martyrs? You mean… terrorists? Israel is defending itself from enemies within and on all sides. Casualties are unfortunate but inevitable in armed conflict. You’d think someone belonging to a tolerant religion of peace would understand that…


“…if [inciting against Jews] is terrorism, we are terrorists,” Attieh continued, further cementing in everyone’s mind that Muslim stereotypes have a high degree of accuracy. “Indeed, I make use of the hatred of the Jews, as all Arabs should, because the Jews respect neither treaties nor human beings. They respect nothing. That accursed [Israeli] ambassador did me a great honor by saying that I hate the Jews. Yes, I hate the Jews. I hate the Jews. I hate the Jews.” He’s repeating himself an awful lot while rambling on about nothing. Perhaps it’s Alzheimer’s?


Attieh concluded his speech with more baseless accusations against Jews, including the tired lineage of “apes and pigs” line from the Qur’an. Sadly, he remains in elected office.




Your Daily Muslim #647: Ismail Kijo


Ismail Kijo

Ismail Kijo



Today’s daily Muslim is a case study in abnormal psychology. Meet Ismail Kijo, a delegate of Malaysia’s UMNO political party. How does Kijo feel he can best serve his nation? By trying to get all gay rights taken away.


“[The practice of homosexuality] should not be allowed, as it is against the rule of nature and therefore we should do what is necessary to curb it,” Kijo stated earlier this year. Actually, homosexuality is observed in numerous animal species and is thus not against nature. Besides, since when have Muslims cared about nature? Kijo’s objection to LGBT rights likely does not stem from the faulty biological component of the argument he presented, but rather from his devout Islamic faith.


What was Kijo’s proposed solution to this dangerous epidemic of gym bunnies and overalls? “With the help of several religious councils, we have cured over 20,000 cases [of homosexuality], and we hope they continue to carry on their good work,” he blathered. Homosexuality is not an ailment. It cannot be “cured.” It’s a sexual orientation, and a perfectly natural and valid one. I have no idea where he got the statistic that over 20,000 Malays changed their sexual orientation, but I imagine he pulled it out of his ass (perhaps along with a dildo or two.)


More recently, the maniacal Muslim made more comments in an attempt to criticize gays, but really he just made homosexuals sound all the more appealing. “Malaysian mothers would be forced to face the harsh possibility that the [lesbian] partners of their daughters could have bigger breasts than them some day,” he said, causing the world to collectively wonder why someone would care about the size of their mother’s tits. Then again, perhaps Kijo’s relationship with his mother was rather close, a la Lysa Arryn from Game of Thrones who breast-fed her 10-year-old son.


“Could you imagine how shocked the mother would be when she sees that this future ‘husband’ has breasts bigger than hers?” First, why would the mother care? She’s not vying for the romantic affection of her daughter. Why would it matter if her daughter’s partner’s breasts are bigger? Second, Kijo’s use of the word ‘husband’ is truly sad; not every marriage is between husband and wife. People are a little more tolerant than that now. Is it just me, or is Kijo’s fascination with lesbians’ breasts potentially indicative of his internet viewing habits? Uh oh, that’s haram (forbidden in Islam)…


Of course, gay men weren’t spared from Kijo’s bizarre wrath. He claimed that mothers would be excited to meet their future “daughters-in-law,” but would be shocked when they had thick mustaches. Guys with thick mustaches? Sounds hot, where do I sign up? I don’t know if Kijo realized that, by saying LGBT people had attractive features, he was complimenting them rather than making a case for why LGBT rights should be stripped. He soon learned the hard way that his views were outlandish – the crowd listening to his speech began to laugh at him, as did the entire world when word of his remarks got out.




Your Daily Muslim #646: Omid Roshan




No one wants any of Omid Roshan's "service."

No one wants any of Omid Roshan’s “service.”



Afghan Muslim Omid Roshan, who arrived in Ausfailia as a “refugee,” was up to no good. Promoting the trope of the pervert who offers children a ride home, he approached a 9-year-old boy after a soccer match. The Muslim pressured the boy into getting into the backseat of his car. He drove the boy past his house before jumping into the backseat and molesting the boy.


“Bacha bazi” is an abhorrent cultural practice many Afghans and others in that region partake in. It normally involves dressing up little boys in feminine clothing and forcing them to dance before raping them. Despite the practitioners’ Islamic faith, most of them do not see it as haram (forbidden) in Islam because the boys are dressed up like girls, thus making it a bizarre “no homo” sort of situation. However, the fact that it is a form of extramarital intercourse should have them worried, as that is zina (fornication), but for whatever reason that concern is generally brushed under the rug.


Roshan, knowing bacha bazi was against the law in the civilized nation of Ausfailia, paid the terrified boy $10 and told him not to tell his parents. However, the visibly traumatized boy explained what had happened to his parents – and the police – when he got home. Roshan packed all of his belongings and began to drive to Sydney. He was arrested shortly after his arrival.


Speaking through an interpreter, Roshan denied all the charges against him, including rape, child abduction and three counts of committing an indecent act with a child. He had to use an interpreter in legal proceedings but had the conversational skills to lure a young boy and instruct him not to tell his parents… something seems fishy about that. Painting himself as an immigrant with little English in a pathetic attempt to win sympathy isn’t gonna work for this perv.





Muslim of the Year Poll


This is it. Time to crown a new champion of incivility. Perks for the winner include being publicly shamed all year on YDM, and infamy across counterjihad social media. These nominees were chosen by you, the readers of YDM. Each nominee won their respective Muslim of the Month poll, and now they must duke it out against their fellow victors. Let’s meet the tributes from each of the twelve districts- I mean, months.


Mustapha Baba Ilelah

Month: February

Country: Nigeria

Mustapha Baba Ilelah is a sharia commissioner who recently initiated a mass roundup of suspected gays. The “suspects” were tortured into confessing and revealing the identities of other gays they knew, who were then also captured by sharia enforcers. Ilelah stated, “We are on the hunt for others.”


Fazlul Haque Amini

Month: November

Country: Bangladesh

Islamic scholar/politician Fazlul Haque Amini said, “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge… Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” Amini also threatened widespread violence if child marriage legislation was blocked.


Sarah Fahmy

Month: May

Country: USA

Brandeis University student Sarah Fahmy authored an overly dramatic petition demanding the University withdraw an honorary degree for counterjihad activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali. The university caved to the Muslimah’s demands and did not award Ali the degree.


Muhammad Yousuf Gujjar

Month: December

Country: Pakistan

Kiln owner Muhammad Yousuf Gujjar held a Christian couple hostage before allowing a mob to break their legs. Gujjar then burned them alive in his kiln for having allegedly desecrated the Qur’an, all based on a rumor started by local Muslims.


Mehdi Nemmouche

Month: October

Country: Algeria/All over the place

Former Islamic State militant Mehdi Nemmouche shot four people to death at a Jewish museum in Belgium. During his time with the Islamic State, he is quoted as saying: “Do you know what happens when I go into a Shiite home? First, there’s the grandmother — I only use one bullet on her, she’s not worth more — then the wife. First I rape her, then I cut her throat. Then I come to the baby. Ah, a baby! You cannot imagine the pleasure you get from cutting off a baby’s head.”


Nasrul Hassan

Month: April

Country: Saudi Arabia

Porn-addled Muslim Nasrul Hassan wrote, “If a 10-year-old can have menstruation cycle, then what is the problem, she can marry and can have baby, it’s a sign from almighty that she can be a mother. Come on grow up folks, Allahu Akbar.”


Sabreena Sadaf

Month: January

Country: Pakistan

Sabreena Sadaf believes eating bacon causes babies to be born out of wedlock. The Muslimah foamed, “IN YOUR DIRTY & WRONG SOCIETY MANY CHILDREN DON’T KNOW THE NAME OF THEIR OWN FATHERS BECAUSE YOUR PIGGY MOTHERS HAVE MANY MEN AT A TIME & YOUR MOTHERS GIVE BIRTH TO BASTARD CHILDREN. THESE ARE THE EFFECTS OF EATING THE FLESH OF PIGS. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YOUR SWINE PIGGY MOTHERS & PIGGIES.” Sadaf also made death threats against infidels.


Naser Jason Abdo

Month: March

Country: USA

Naser Jason Abdo was discharged from the military after refusing to fight in Afghanistan. Upon his discharge, child porn was discovered on his computer. Abdo then plotted to bomb and shoot US soldiers, but was arrested just days before the attack would’ve taken place. After he was behind bars, he claimed he was HIV+ and spat blood at people. The irony is that this wannabe jihadi stated “Only when the military and America can disassociate Muslims from terror can we move onto a brighter future of religious collaboration and dialogue that defines America and makes me proud to be an American.”


Muhammed Ejaz

Month: June

Country: Pakistan

Closet-case Muhammed Ejaz met men online for sex, then drugged them, molested them, and killed them by snapping their necks because “they were spreading evil in society and [he] had to stop it.” He also said “[Gays] are spreading evil and transmitting diseases. They cannot control themselves.” Ejaz took three men’s lives before he was arrested.


Ismail Jabbar

Month: July

Country: UK/Syria

Ismail Jabbar traveled to wage jihad in Syria. He has posted images of himself killing Syrian government forces, calling them “dirty kuff[ar],” and has instructed his fellow Muslims to carry out terror attacks like the murder of Lee Rigby. He said Muslims who kill Jews and Christians would be doubly rewarded, claimed all jihadists long to behead infidels, and has expressed an interest in going for 72 virgins.


Ilyas Qadri

Month: August

Country: Pakistan

Sheikh Ilyas Qadri ran an Islamic rehab center. At the center, he chained 112 boys and men (his “patients”) together, where they were routinely beaten, tortured, and starved. Qadri molested some of the younger boys. He was acquitted in 2007 but did the same thing in 2014, this time with 115 boys and men.


Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari

Month: September

Country: Lebanon/Saudi Arabia

Islamic scholar Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari believes that “saying Merry Christmas is worse than killing someone.” Akkari also said, “Muhammad smelled so good, they used to make [the] most beautiful perfume with his sweat.” He also claimed that women wearing perfume was “an invitation” for men to sexually harass them.





Your Daily Muslim #639: Shahul Ahmed


Shahul Ahmed's Twitter avatar, an icon of the group Anonymous

Shahul Ahmed’s Twitter avatar, an icon of the group Anonymous



“Where are you the Muslim world!!!! If we don’t fight for [Masjid al-Aqsa] why are we living then…”


Shahul Ahmed is not this Muslim’s real name. It is an alias he uses to do the work of his beloved sky-demon Allah. Numerous Islamic black-hat (malicious) hackers have recently been targeting any and all Israeli sites. Ahmed is one such hacker. Identifying with the hacktivist group Anonymous, Ahmed has gloated in the takedown of several prominent Israeli sites, including resources for families of children with Down Syndrome, the Children’s Memorial Association, and educational institutions. In other words, evil bastions of Zionism, no doubt.


Here’s an image of what Ahmed and others do to sites they target:


"Jerusalem is ours" - I beg to differ.

“Jerusalem is ours” – I beg to differ.



Masjid al-Aqsa is an Islamic holy site located in Israel. Much of the jihad against Israel comes from Muslims who desperately want to retake that mosque and the surrounding land despite it being located in a Jewish nation.


More pig-hatred? Yawn. Predictable.

More pig-hatred? Yawn. Predictable.



Ahmed and his BFFs also targeted American sites, including the University of Nevada – Las Vegas and Florida International University. As many contend, Islam and liberal arts education tend not to go hand in hand, and Ahmed is doing a good job proving that. A handful of Indian sites were hit as well, likely due to Muslims’ disdain for Hindus.


This is a screenshot from one of Ahmed’s hacker group’s YouTube channels, outlining how to extract the identities of sites hosted on a particular server. Note how pathetic and childish this is – like left-wing crybabies, Muslims can’t handle any criticism. However, unlike left-wing crybabies, Muslims respond with violence instead of harpy-esque histrionics.


shahulahmed3


If this site goes down in the near future, blame this raging, butthurt Muslim who is proving how tolerant his “religion of peace” is.




Your Daily Muslim #638: Mohamed Makhloufi




She does not need any of that cake...

She does not need any of that cake…



Tunisian Muslim Mohamed Makhloufi, 32, a former coffee shop worker, realized he wanted to join the rest of the Muslim ummah in their invasion of the UK. To do so, he joined a dating site, where he found his prey: a grandmother in her mid-40′s named Jane. She was probably an easy target; aging hamplanets kinda get desperate (gee, I wonder why), though Jane said she wasn’t looking for anything serious at the time she met Makhloufi. After Jane, who suffers from multiple forms of arthritis and lives on incapacity benefits, took several trips to Tunisia to be with Makhloufi, he proposed to his visa her.


Of course, she immediately said yes, seeing as how she believed he was the one for her. She felt he wasn’t “only after one thing” when dating her. Well, clearly that one thing wasn’t sex. However, he is widely believed to be after one thing: a visa. What Makhloufi is thought to have done in marrying Jane is a common practice among young north African Muslim men, who are often crudely referred to as “love rats.” This is similar to the “love jihad” waged against Hindu women, where Muslim men try to (often coercively) convert Hindu women through relationships and marriage.


Jane made love jihad a non-goal for Makhloufi – she said she would willingly convert to Islam for him and start wearing the traditional Islamic ninja costume. Assuming there is a hijab or niqab that fits, this might not be the worst fashion blunder she could make.


Jane is lobbying government officials to grant Makhloufi a visa. He is currently working elsewhere, and Jane claims the separation is aggravating various medical conditions of hers. Maybe it’s the separation… or maybe it’s her diet. Just saying.





Your Daily Muslim #637: Holly Booth




Holly Booth

Holly Booth



Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s sister-in-law, Lauren, is a convert to Islam. Recently, she and her Muslim family went to Egypt on vacation. Her daughter, Holly, had quite an experience there – she was told she couldn’t go in the hotel’s swimming pool while wearing what appeared to be a baggy, bright headbag.


Holly’s reaction was to play the Islamophobia card, as I’m sure she had learned from numerous sources in the Islamic community. She claimed Egypt was a “Muslim country,” before asking, “can you really be Muslim in the Muslim society?” Uhh, yes, you can, but you’re at a 5-star hotel. Those aren’t exactly known for being bastions of sharia compliance. Also, a young girl wearing baggy clothing in a swimming pool is an obvious drowning risk, and has potential to be a PR disaster in case tragedy strikes. It makes zero sense to allow Holly to wear baggy clothing in the pool, but logic was apparently not enough to satisfy.





Your Daily Muslim #636: Ibrahim Melih Gökçek


The bespectacled Ibrahim Melih Gökçek cowering when confronted in the real world

The bespectacled Ibrahim Melih Gökçek cowering when confronted in the real world



Ankara, Turkey. The city’s mayor, Ibrahim Melih Gökçek, made some offensive comments about abortion during a televised interview. “Women kill their babies born out of adultery. Why do babies die because of these so-called mothers? Let mothers kill themselves.” This led two young women to throw eggs at him, as an act of both overt and symbolic defiance, both expressing outrage and signifying they have control over their bodies and eggs. What was Gökçek’s move? Press charges against the women and seek to imprison them for ten years.


Yes, ten years for throwing eggs at somebody. Hello, abuse of power. The women were sentenced to two years and seven months behind bars, which is still absolutely ridiculous. Not to mention how absurd Gökçek’s comments were; some women need abortions for all sorts of reasons. Plus, if a woman knows she is unfit to be a parent, why should society force her to bear the burden of a pregnancy? Saying women who want to terminate their pregnancies should kill themselves is both heartless and hypocritical from a pro-life standpoint. As for infanticide of newborns born out of wedlock, well, maybe removing the social stigma against unwed mothers might be a good idea? But that wouldn’t be OK in totally modern Islam.


This isn’t the first time Gökçek has (ab)used his political office, which he has held for 25 years, to punish those who oppose him. He has sued numerous people (he claims the number is around 3,000) who have made snide remarks to him on Twitter, as well as those who publicly protest against him. No wonder he’s stayed in power so long; everyone who speaks against him ends up penniless.


One of the people Gökçek recently persecuted was a woman who posted an image of stilettoed feet stepping on the Qur’an, which many Muslims took offense to. Due to Gökçek’s party’s Islamist ties, his litigation jihad against the woman was a predictable response. “No one has the right to insult our religion,” Gökçek tweeted about the case. The woman was arrested on suspicion of blasphemy and inciting hatred, but was released after interrogation. Of course, Gökçek is now suing the woman, because somehow being offended is reason enough to sue somebody. Then again, all the perpetually-offended professional-victim liberals have started to adopt the same litigiousness because their women’s studies degrees haven’t been paying the bills. The entire point of free speech is that it is free, without the threat of being sued for speaking out. I wonder if Gökçek will sue me for his impending Muslim of the Month nomination…


On Twitter, Gökçek has also lauded anti-Semites and called a BBC reporter an English infiltrator. He tweeted: “Led by England, they are trying to collapse our economy via agents hired, both nationally and internationally. They are dreaming for Turkey to be the ‘Sick man of Europe’ once again. Here is a concrete proof.” Oh look, another conspiracy about the west trying to bring the Muslim world to ruin. When his crazed rantings drew international criticism, he responded in his typical fashion: “My lawyer is going to sue everyone one by one who tweets #ProvokatorMelihGokcek No one can get away with anything because Turkey is a country of law.” Excuse me while I roll my eyes. And you know what’s really bringing the Muslim world to ruin? The fact that a woman can get arrested for “blasphemy.” That’s the real problem. Hopefully the citizens of Ankara drive Gökçek out.




Your Daily Muslim #635: Mohammad Farman Ali


Mohammad Farman Ali

Mohammad Farman Ali



Pakistani Muslim Mohammad Farman Ali is a man of many appetites. His hunger grew insatiable. When he saw locals burying a woman’s body, he knew he couldn’t resist any longer. That night, he unearthed the woman and hid her body in his house he shared with his brother, Mohammad Arif. Upon a visit to the grave the following day, locals immediately contacted police. A foul smell led them to Ali’s house. The odor grew stronger as they made their way toward Ali’s room.


When the door was kicked open, they saw it – the woman’s dismembered corpse, one leg having been amputated at the knee and the other missing a foot. The body had attracted a swarm of ants. Local policeman Fakar Bhatti commented, “In the middle of the room, I saw a cooking pot which was half full of [human] meat curry. Nearby was a wooden board, a butcher’s axe and a large kitchen knife. Bits of fat clung to the board and the blade of the axe.”


Ali was not home at the time, but his brother was taken into custody. Ali was tracked down and arrested at a later date. When interviewed, Ali said he had written “certain verses of the Qur’an in reverse as a way of casting a spell on his neighbors.” In order for the sorcery to work, he said he and his brother had to be unwashed and consume human flesh.


This was not the first time Ali had misbehaved. His wife, who fled the marriage, said he beat her and would often leave in the night. Because Islam liberates women, Ali locked his wife in the house during his night ventures (read: corpse runs.) Upon his arrest, he confessed to having exhumed numerous other bodies with his brother. It is believed the brothers dug up over 100 corpses before their capture.


The pair were convicted and served two years behind bars. However, their quest to get their sorcery skills to level 85 meant they would need to dig up more bodies. The grisly ritual began again. This time, however, it was even more extreme. The night after a three-year-old boy was buried, the brothers set out on another graverobbing expedition. However, the putrid stench of the corpse followed them to their house and disturbed neighbors the next day, and the police found the men yet again practicing their Islamic vein of magic.


The boy’s severed head was sitting out in the open, a gruesome decoration adorning the brothers’ ritual space. The two men were arrested a second time, and are now back behind bars where they are unable to perform their horrific rites.




Your Daily Muslim #634: Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf




Is he facepalming or praying? Or facepalming because he's praying?

Is he facepalming or praying? Or facepalming because he’s praying?



Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf, born Chris Wayne Jackson, played for the Denver Nuggets. His career plummeted after he took a bizarre stand – or, more specifically, seat. Instead of standing for the national anthem with the rest of his team, Abdul-Rauf chose to remain seated or stretch. Why? Because he is Muslim – and any form of national identity or patriotism is against Islam.


Abdul-Rauf received a one-game suspension for his refusal to take part in the ceremony everyone else was involved in. A compromise was reached where he would not have to put his hand over his heart or sing along, but could instead quietly pray in Arabic during the song. He also became known for covering brand logos on his uniform and fasting during Ramadan, even when that coincided with training or games.


What this tells us is that Muslims have an active incentive to not be patriotic – the power of Allah compels them to be sourpusses. Next time someone is reciting the national anthem or the pledge of allegiance, look at any Muslims in the area – they will likely not be taking part.





Your Daily Muslim #630: Nathaniel Hughes


He really needs to clean his room... also, I doubt FOX News is in line with his views, just saying.

He really needs to clean his room… also, I doubt FOX News is in line with his views.



Today’s daily Muslim is Lexington, South Carolina resident Nathaniel Hughes, who has more or less admitted support of the Islamic State terror group. What’s truly alarming about Hughes is the openness he displays when discussing his fanatical leanings. Though he has not mentioned any plans to join the Islamic State or carry out a jihad attack for them, his apparent ideological ties to the group are quite alarming.


When Hughes found the counterjihad page known as Izlam is Shit on Facebook, he and numerous other Muslims began trying to argue with the page’s administrator and fans. Hughes was generally non-combative until he revealed the true nature of his beliefs in this veiled threat against Israel:


nathanielhughes3


Why would he say such a thing? If he is trying to represent his allegedly “peaceful” faith, why would he boast about the impending actions of one of the world’s most aggressive terror groups? Here are some screenshots from his Facebook wall where he discusses his support of the Islamic State. If he isn’t on a watchlist yet, he should be.


Lumping the beliefs of all Americans in with those of the Ban Islam Facebook page is a bit narrow-minded, don't you think?

Lumping the beliefs of all Americans in with those of the Ban Islam Facebook page is a bit narrow-minded, don’t you think?



The crazy hyperbole is strong in this one.

The crazy hyperbole is strong in this one.



Why shouldn’t you support the Islamic State? Like, what kind of idiotic question is that? They kill people for not being Muslims, cut off the hands of thieves, and hold women captive as sex slaves. Why *would* anyone support the Islamic State unless they were equally savage?


Hughes uses the Qur'an to justify his violent, jihadist beliefs. A mushrik is someone who worships something aside from Allah in the capacity of idolatry/polytheism.

Hughes uses the Qur’an to justify his violent, jihadist beliefs. A mushrik is someone who worships something aside from Allah in the capacity of idolatry/polytheism.



Of course, Hughes does not hesitate to condemn Israel, ignorant of the facts. I’ve totally never seen a Muslim do that…


nathanielhughes6


nathanielhughes8


And here, we see Hughes calling Islamic State terrorists his “brothers” in Islam. If the actions of the Islamic State are truly against Islam, Hughes would speak against the group. But what do we see?


nathanielhughes10


Allies, please share this piece. Make sure everyone knows about this potential threat lurking within our borders.




Your Daily Muslim #627: Muhammad Mustafa al-Jibaly


Muhammad Mustafa al-Jibaly

Muhammad Mustafa al-Jibaly



“How terrible it would be for a person whom Allah has favored with Islam to find himself resurrected on the Day of Judgment among non-Muslims – simply because he liked to imitate them.”


Seventh-century regressive Dr. Muhammad Mustafa al-Jibaly is a noted Muslim author and former president of the al-Qur’an was-Sunnah Society of North America, a Salafi Muslim group. The pamphlets and short books al-Jibaly has written are full of unintentionally hilarious passages like, “Astronomical evidence may not be used to establish moon sighting or to verify or refute the sighting of trustworthy Muslims[,]” and make for humorous light reading, kinda like this site except infinitely more stunted.


One of al-Jibaly’s books is titled The Beard Between the Salaf & Khalaf and discusses the Islamic rules and regulations regarding beards – and all other sorts of male body hair. For some unknown reason, it has yet to catch on among the gay community in spite of totally not suggestive passages like, “Anas reported: ‘Allah’s Messenger [pigs be upon him] timed for us trimming our moustaches, clipping our nails, pulling our armpit hair, and shaving our pubic hair – that we do not delay that beyond forty nights.'” So Muhammad, pigs be upon him, liked to watch dudes shave their pubes… hmm. Says a lot.


“All the ‘ulama’ (scholars) of as-Salaf us-Salih (the Righteous early Muslims), including the Four Imams, agree that shaving the beard is haram (prohibited),” al-Jibaly wrote. “They consider shaving it an impermissible mutilation, as has been reported from Umar Bin Abdul Aziz- [At-Tarikh by Ibn Asakir]. They considered the man who shaved his beard effeminate. Many of them would not accept his testimony or allow him to lead the prayers.” Now, I’m sure many of you have heard of one ancient Islamic reasoning behind keeping a beard – so as to not incite desire in other men by appearing (allegedly) effeminate. Preventing a clean-shaven man from leading prayers due to their collective jealousy at his proper grooming habits (causing them to look homeless by comparison) is really catty and childish.


“Shaving the beard is an act of disobedience to Allah, as is expressed in the words of his messenger, Abu Hurayrah reported that the ruler of Yemen, appointed by the Persian emperor Kisra, sent two envoys to the messenger [pigs be upon him]. When they came into his presence, he noticed that they had shaved their beards and let their moustaches grow big. Hating their ugly appearance, he turned his face away and said, ‘Woe be to you, who told you to do so?'” Some men look better with facial hair, others don’t. For a religion to command some people to make themselves uglier in order to uphold a bizarre ancient standard is absurd. But Muhammad, pigs be upon him, was right about one thing – moustaches without an accompanying beard generally don’t look great. Despite his poor taste in wives (read: 6-year-old girls), perhaps Muhammad had good taste in men.


“There is no doubt that Allah’s messenger is the best example of a man, both in his appearance and actions,” al-Jibaly continued. So this modern-day scholar is saying he has complete confidence a dude from the 7th century whom he has never seen is hotter than Channing Tatum et al. Excuse me while I laugh. And don’t even get me started on Muhammad, pigs be upon him, being the best example of a man in his actions – he was a warlord and a child molester.


“[S]having the beard is an act of imitation of the disbelievers, and should be extremely abhorred,” wrote the cleric. Muslims are commanded to be kind to one another but harsh against the kuffar in the Qur’an, and this teaching is in line with that. Aren’t you impressed at how well Islam can integrate into our secular, multicultural society?


Of course, men weren’t the only ones al-Jibaly targeted with his anti-shaving rhetoric. “The messenger [pigs be upon him] has declared that the women who change what Allah has created (such as removing their facial hair, wearing wigs, filing their teeth, or tattooing their bodies) seeking by that to improve their appearance, are accursed by Allah.” I see no reason for a Muslimah to wear a wig; it’s all covered underneath that ridiculous ninja costume they wear. As for filing teeth, it can be necessary, especially after an injury or something of the sort. These blanket prohibitions do more harm than good and create an atmosphere of absurd austerity.


Now, let’s get into that facial hair part. If a woman is not allowed to remove her facial hair and a man is not allowed to remove his facial hair so he doesn’t look like a woman, then by that logic are women not supposed to look like women? Is anyone else as confused by this Islamic “logic” as I am?


That logic becomes especially confounding when looking at this next passage from al-Jibaly. “The beard presents a major distinction between men and women. Shaving it removes this distinction, and is thus a means of imitating women. Any act that involves imitation of the opposite gender makes a person liable for the curse of Allah and his messenger.” Wait, didn’t Muhammad cross-dress to allegedly receive revelations? Oh wait, yeah, Sahih Bukhari 2393 indicates Muhammad said, “…the inspiration did not come upon me when I was in a women’s garment except that of Aisha.” So did Muhammad, pigs be upon him, curse himself? Or was he just a massive hypocrite?


al-Jibaly has also written in support of strict Salafi Islam and the phenomenon he refers to as “Salafi burnout,” where people abandon the religion’s austerity. He commented, “[O]ne sister who used to wear niqab in Houston is now giving dawah on YouTube with her face and neck indecently showing.” Really? A woman showing her face is indecent? You know, your allegedly all-powerful Allah created women uncovered. If he wanted them to be covered, wouldn’t he have covered them when he created them? The niqab is a tool of oppression, nothing more.


Another topic al-Jibaly decided to express his knowledge of was the barbaric ritual new parents partake in seven days after birth. In Islam, the slaughter of aqiqah is allegedly an act of thankfulness to Allah, but it’s really just an act of unnecessary cruelty. New parents must slaughter an animal in the barbaric halal fashion (or have one slaughtered for them), then prepare and consume its meat with members of the community in a celebratory feast. Here’s where it gets weird – often, two goats are sacrificed for the birth of a male child, while only one is sacrificed for a female. This is in line with teaching that the testimony of a woman is worth half that of a man, and is further evidence that Islam does not equally value women, despite what lying Muslims and idiot apologists tell you. There is a Hadith which backs up this absurd practice, “Narrated Umm Kurz: The Prophet of Allah (peace be upon him) said: Two sheep which resemble each other are to be sacrificed for a boy and one for a girl.” (Sunan Abu Dawood Book 15, No. 2830) Cows, goats, sheep, and camels are the most common aqiqah sacrifices.


That isn’t the only sexist practice al-Jibaly has written about. You know how many Muslimahs say wearing the hijab is a choice? I’ll just let al-Jibaly disprove that for you: “A girl should start hijab from the age of seven. By the age of ten it becomes an obligation on us to force her to wear hijab.” The purpose of wearing the hijab is to allegedly preserve a girl’s modesty, to keep her from tempting men with her uncovered skin. What al-Jibaly is saying is that he believes girls at the age of seven become tempting to men, and certainly do by the age of ten. Eww.


What is his proposed solution? Tell Muslim men to not be pedophiles? No, because that would be going against the example of the prophet. “And if she doesn’t wear hijab, we hit her.” Yep, that’s right – child abuse is his suggested solution. Blame the girl for not wanting to obey a bizarre rule forced on her by men who would apparently otherwise be tempted to violate her. If this savagery doesn’t outrage you, congratulations, you’re probably a Muslim.


Look out for more publications from al-Jibaly in the future – they might be even more unintentionally hilarious than his ramblings about body hair.




Your Daily Muslim #626: Marium Navid


Marium Navid

Marium Navid



When Muslims hear something they don’t like, they often try to silence that opinion, whether by beheading, legal oppression, or in today’s case, complaining. When counterjihadist Bill Maher was selected to speak at notoriously leftist UC Berkeley’s fall commencement, ASUC Senator (ugh… another one of these student-government types) Marium Navid jumped into action to defend her religion. The Muslimah started a petition on change.org (ugh… another change.org petition) to have Maher replaced as commencement speaker due to his counterjihad beliefs.


“It’s not an issue of freedom of speech, it’s a matter of campus climate,” Navid stated when interviewed. “The First Amendment gives him the right to speak his mind, but it doesn’t give him the right to speak at such an elevated platform as the commencement. That’s a privilege his racist and bigoted remarks don’t give him.” One, Islam is not a race. Opposition to Islam or Muslims is not racism. Two, that’s exactly the point of free speech – campus officials chose Maher as being a worthwhile choice of commencement speaker, thus he does have the right to give whatever speech he desires as he has been granted the platform to do so. To ask that the speech be taken away from him would only prove him right that Muslims cannot handle criticism.


Navid launched a campaign called “Free Speech, Not Hate Speech” as another measure to try to stop Maher from speaking. The goal of this campaign is for Muslim students and their leftist appeaser allies to contact university officials and speak out against Maher’s impending speech. The name of the campaign is horribly funny, when you think about it – trying to stifle speech is exactly the opposite of free speech. I’m unsure whether or not Navid has realized this.


Aside from her anti-Maher escapades, Navid is also an outspoken supporter of Palestine and is in favor of UC Berkeley divesting from Israel. Yes, the Israel that is a beacon of tolerance for LGBT people and religious minorities in the Middle East. Yes, the Israel that treats wounded Palestinian children in its hospitals. Navid also co-wrote this piece, criticizing the choice of a Jewish man as UCLA student regent and complaining about alleged Islamophobia on UC campuses. You know, maybe the ninja costumes and inability to drink might be a contributing factor to that. Just saying.


Despite her opinions thus far being largely disagreeable, Navid does have one redeeming stance: the opposition to drone strikes, which normally end up causing far more collateral damage than is needed to complete their mission. “The more you hit these villages, the more you kill civilians,” she said. “This is not just a Muslim issue; it’s a matter of social justice.” Ugh, she had to ruin it with that stupid liberal buzzword, “social justice.” Basically, that term has devolved to mean “progression toward statism where only left-wing views are permitted.” On Tumblr and other locales infested with leftists (likely UC Berkeley), the definition can be extended to “if you are a straight white man, your opinion is automatically invalid because you are a racist because I said so!”


Let’s hope Navid’s campaign falls on deaf ears. Maher would certainly give a great speech, and he’d probably not even say anything offensive because, come on, it’s a commencement speech. He probably wouldn’t delve into Islam unless his mortal enemy Ben Affleck were there.




Canada Attacks Follow al-Qaida, IS Instructions To A Tee


“These deadly acts appear to follow what al-Qaida has been preaching for years through articles or videos posted online, calling on recruits and volunteers to go it alone without specific orders or training.”


Source:Canada Attacks Follow al-Qaida, IS Instructions To A Tee | Defense News | defensenews.com


Date posted: October 24, 2014

Muslim of the Month Poll




Only two more polls until the Muslim of the Year nominees will have been finalized! Who will earn the title of Muslim of the Month for November?


Abdullah el-Faisal – Jamaican-born convert/cleric who said, “Those who want to go to jannah (Islamic heaven), it’s easy, just kill a kafir (infidel)… by killing that kafir, you have purchased your ticket to paradise.” el-Faisal also stated in a lecture, “So you go to India, and if you see a Hindu walking down the road you are allowed to kill him and take his money, is that clear?”


Martin Ahmad Couture-Rouleau – French-Canadian Muslim convert who ran down two soldiers, killing one, in an attempt to die as a “martyr” and be accepted into Islamic heaven. Rouleau claimed he carried out the attack for Allah before being shot dead by police.


Faleh Ghazi Albasman – Kuwaiti Muslim who immigrated to the UK with his 24-year-old daughter. When he saw his daughter talking on a cellphone, he stabbed her to death for ruining his “honor.”


Fazlul Haque Amini – Bangladeshi Islamic scholar/politician who said, “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge… Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.”






Your Daily Muslim #625: Pakeeza Shaikh




Pakeeza Shaikh

Pakeeza Shaikh



Unlike in the USA, Islam’s jihad against swimming pools is going swimmingly in Ausfailia. Pakeeza Shaikh, along with her family and numerous other Muslim families, went to the Adventure World water park in Perth. That’s when things took a turn for the dramatic when Shaikh’s traditional Islamic clothing was deemed to violate park standards.


The clothes Shaikh was wearing were street clothes, including a long, droopy top, and long pants. As is common for Muslimahs, many in the group were wearing headbags. Citing sanitation concerns seeing as Shaikh’s clothes were her street clothes, Adventure World staff told he she would not be allowed to enter the water because they would have to add more chlorine to remove the dirt transfer. Safety concerns with her long clothing were cited when she asked to go down a water slide, but was refused.


Instead of changing into something a bit less baggy, Shaikh saw a prime grievance-mongering opportunity. She filed a lawsuit against the park after complaining to the Equal Opportunity Commission, claiming she had felt humiliated by the staff because she covered herself. Since leftists see it as discrimination when Muslims are forced to follow the same rules as everyone else, Shaikh won $16,000 from the park, which has since stated it is reviewing its clothing policy… and likely upping the chlorine levels.


If you own or work at a swimming pool or other aquatic facility, protect yourself from litigation jihad: put up signs on the premises forbidding people from wearing street clothing or clothing which could be a safety hazard. Muslims cannot legitimately claim this is discrimination because the rule would apply unilaterally and would certainly end up affecting some non-Muslim patrons with poor choices of attire.





Your Daily Muslim #624: Mohammad Kazim bin Elias




Mohammad Kazim bin Elias

Mohammad Kazim bin Elias



Another day, another YDM named Mohammad… it never gets old. Malay Islamic scholar/preacher Mohammad Kazim bin Elias generated controversy recently after his condemnation of a (wait for it) dog-petting event. Islam views dogs as being nejis (ritually unclean), and Muhammad himself, pigs be upon him, called for the slaughter of canines. Apparently being cute and cuddly is haram.


The organizer of the event has been more or less forced into hiding due to death threats from Kazim’s rabid fans, including threats to stone him to death – all for organizing a harmless event where people can pet and possibly even adopt furry companions. Many of the foamers claimed the event’s organizer was trying to “destroy Islam” and the like. Kazim himself claimed it was a way to “inject pluralism and liberalism” into the Muslim ummah (spiritual community.) Because those are such bad things that the Muslim community totally isn’t in need of…


Kazim claimed the dog-petting event was a “subtle elbow movement” toward “legalizing something haram,” and also believes such events will “ultimately transform and negate the purpose of the law.” Kazim also mentioned that allowing this event could lead to a similar campaign involving petting and perhaps eating pigs. The self-imposed deprivation of bacon is quite possibly what has made over a billion Muslims worldwide go mad.


I left the foamers on Kazim’s post condemning the event, which has over 13,000 shares, a very nice comment. Now, I’m going to go look at pictures of Swedish Vallhunds because they are basically wolf corgis.